Your Company May Be Losing Money By Retiring Employees When They Clock 60 Years - And Above!

People Often STILL Have A Lot To Offerhim below:
Organisations(& Society) After They Stop BeingIn the 1870s, the then Chancellor of Germany -
YoungBismarck - was studying the problems posed to him,
From the time we were kids, up till now, each of usby a number of rather powerful enemies he had in
will - at one time or the other - have had contactGerman polity. He discovered that they all had one
with an aged person(or maybe you are one!). Inthing in common: they were "men who were 65
certain societies, it is assumed that old/aging peopleyears or older".
will be limited in the extent to which they can beSo, the smart Chancellor used his influence as the
useful to us - or themselves - for that matter. It isincumbent, to persuade the German legislature to
true that there will come a time, when a person is soenact a law making 65 the mandatory age for
far gone in age, that s/he might become considerablyretirement!
dependent on others for the most basic needs.In other words, this retirement age palaver had
However, so long as good health and living/welfareabsolutely nothing to do with retrogression in "mental
conditions are not lacking, most people are likely toabilities", or a decline in "productivity" for that matter!
enjoy relatively active lifestyles, even in their old age.Instead, Bismarck had this law passed, so as to
As a result, they will be potentially capable of makingeliminate those old but sagacious individuals, who
useful contributions to development of people andmade "trouble" for him as political opponents. These
society by drawing on their years of acquiredmen's time-nurtured wisdom, experience, power,
experience and wisdom. The degree to which this iscontacts/connections etc gave him cause to "fear"
achieved of course will vary from culture to culture.them. He knew they had what it would take to deal
For instance, take a look at most of the extremelyhim fatal blows politically, if he left them "running
insightful, and thought-provoking proverbs unique toloose" - hence the law.
African(and Asian) societies. You will find that oldNow the funny part was that other European
aging people in these societies are the ones whocountries inexplicably followed suit subsequently.
distilled their (good and bad) experiences in life, intoEventually the "policy" was adopted in America and
proverbs, as a means of "teaching" or "guiding" otherof course the rest of the world followed!
younger/not-so-old others towards taking the "right".
steps in the "journey of life".Zig ended by lamenting the tragic fact that this policy
That in itself, is evidence that old/aging people in anymakes people quit when they (to quote him) "are at
social setting, have a powerfully significant role theythe very peak of their intellect, wisdom, contacts,
can play - if encouraged to do so. These peoplepower, experience, organisation, and networks that
spend their "less busy" days, reflecting on pastthey have built over a period of a lifetime!"
experiences - and using them to coach willingHow Much Of What We (Think We) Know Is True
younger persons they come into contact with. In theCorrect?
process, they come up with proverbs, anecdotes,Can you imagine how every year research findings
parables, folk tales etc to pass "educative" messagesby scientists continue to invalidate the "truths" we
about "life" to their "students" or"think" we know about ourselves and the world we
protégés.live in?
Think about the "Tortoise" stories for instance. ManyYou could of course say we're being brainwashed
African born persons today, know or have heard oneeven now with these aforementioned findings. But I
or more stories about the Tortoise, and his trickyalways measure things like this against the impact
ways! The stories are always engaging, yet thetheir application makes on people and society in real
messages skillfully wrapped into them never lose theirlife. Evidence is rife to confirm that these findings are
impact. A child, who has heard what Tortoise's greedactually consistent with what has always obtained in
caused him to suffer, often recalls it at the exactnature. As Zig said, the bible itself, when it did speak
moment when s/he is contemplating "picking" a pieceof retirement - did so in reference to it as a form of
of meat from the pot while no one is looking!punishment!
So, what is my point? It is that persons we call "oldThink about it! Look at the Old Testament, and
or aged persons", often have "locked" within them acheck the ages at which people mentioned in it
rich reservoir of potentially useful knowledge. Thisfulfilled their roles - Abraham, Sarah, etc. They were
knowledge derives from various experiences they'vewell past ages that we in today's world consider that
had over the years. If they were to consciouslyone ought to "retire".
draw upon that knowledge reservoir, they couldCould it be that we are actually STILL capable of
make themselves practically indispensable tostaying as virile and active as those people were in
whatever group or organisation they choose totheir time, right into 100 years and above. Could it be
belong.that we have allowed ourselves to be convinced that
Organisations And The "Retire At 60 Years &we are supposed to gradually age away, and
Above" Rulebecome less capable by the time we cross 60 - 65
Organisations normally have employees of variousyears?
ages, and at different stages of career advancementWhen you think about the saying that "whatever
working in them. Generally, in many organisations,you think about yourself is what you become", then
there is a rule that at a specified age (typicallyone is tempted to consider that this is indeed the
between 60 and 65), employees are expected toreason why many people appear to "expire" at those
retire. Typically, the conditions of service documentsages. They were told that that were supposed to
in a company would state this requirement. In my"expire" or "grow old" by then, and they believed it!
experience, few people really bother to find outBut Why Should YOU Believe All This?
WHY they have to retire at that period of their lives,Because biological research evidence has finally
but it appears to be generally assumed(or accepted?)confirmed what people in the old days have always
that at that age, most people will no longer be ableknown - that we DO NOT lose functionality "upstairs"
to meet the requirements for doing their jobsas we grow old. Instead our brains can still be
satisfactorily.(There is also the other matter, ofdeveloped further to enable us deliver better brain
creating room for "young/fresh blood" to join thepower/output to contribute meaningfully to society.
organisation.)If this is true, then it means if we take many of our
What appears not to have been considered in manyold/aging people who have spent years doing certain
cases, is whether or not this rule should apply bothkinds of jobs, we can engage them in productive
to jobs requiring mainly physical exertion, and thoseroles that have more to do with THINKING up
which only demand mental exertion by the employee.solutions to identified problems. (There might be need
In the former case, the fact that the ageing processfor "brain-training" like those recommended by Tony
leads to weakening of the body muscles, dulledBuzan in his book, but ultimately, positive results can
reflexes etc cannot be denied. However, in the latter,be obtained.)
what one seems to happen is that people haveThe expectation is that they will draw upon the
come to assume(or accept?)that since the body isyears of experience they've had, which many of the
ageing, then so will the mind (or brain)!.supposedly brighter, and younger colleagues may not
That is probably why you and I would find ithave. These could then be combined with their
incredible that a 96-year-old man signed a five-yearincreased thinking abilities, to help their teams solve
deal with a hotel in Las Vegas, USA instead of tenspecific problems in various areas of specialisation.
years because he wasn't sure the resort would lastCorporate organisations might find that they can
ten years"! Let's face it, most "sensible" people wouldsuccessfully employ this technique. It is also
simply laugh at the old man for even thinking he hadconceivable that many of such older people could
anything to offer - talk less of having him give theactually enjoy this kind of attention, since it would be
hoteliers a condition because he doubted they couldan acknowledgment of their continued usefulness
last ten years!!(This true story is recorded inrelevance(they don't even need to remain in the
reference item no. 3 listed at the bottom of thisemploy of the company to do this).
page).Of course there is the issue of reversing the years
But then, THAT "old" man knew something othersof brainwashing that people like this have been
did not - and was certainly convinced about his ideas.subjected to. By this I refer to certain societies in
What he knew is the reason why I have written thiswhich some of such people might not be willing to
report. By the time you finish reading it, you willbelieve that they are capable of functioning that
(hopefully) be armed with knowledge and goodusefully again. In such cases, they would be better
understanding of what ageing and experience ADD toleft alone, since without their believing they can do it,
a person that makes him/her MORE potentially usefulno amount of training will enable them achieve the
to others.desired levels of performance.
You will in effect know what that "old" AmericanI once worked in a large multinational corporation as a
man knew, and will (hopefully) use it to negotiateprocess manager - a brewer to be specific. I still recall
favourably for yourself in your later years. MostVERY vividly that many of the long serving process
importantly, this knowledge will help you - as aoperators who retired at the mandatory age defined
decision maker - AVOID retiring your employeesby the company were often still in their prime - at
when they could still have more "USE VALUE" toleast as far as their ability to do their jobs went.
offer, in exchange for the CASH value you give toMany were among the best in what they did. In fact,
them. This could be a key factor that determines thewhen they left, the brewery would sometimes limp
long term success or otherwise of your companyalong for many months before settling for some
business.reasonably satisfactory replacements for them in
Revealing Research Findings About Age, Ageingtheir area of the process! Over the seven(7) year
& The Brainperiod I spent in the brewery, I came to develop a
The story about the origin of this retirement agehealthy respect for these men.
palavar is quite an amusing one. Historical accountsThese supposedly "old" operatives frequently had
have it that the "tradition" (if we can call it that)knowledge/expertise that made them adept at
came into acceptance for a reason TOTALLYmanaging their aspects of the process. When
unconnected with age. This tradition was a fallout ofparticularly difficult/recurring process problems
POLITICAL developments that occurred as far backoccurred, they were often useful resource persons
as the 1870s! A brief narrative of the story ismembers of successful problem-solving teams. And
provided later on in this report (from reference itemas in-house trainers(with proper motivation), they
no. 3 listed at the bottom of this page)..often turned out superbly prepared
This report is preparing you to appreciate how ourprotégés, who subsequently required
"thinking" has been conditioned by society, to acceptlittle or no formal training from the company's
limitations to our (mental) capabilities - that do notTraining department(I should know - I was Technical
exist! People have learnt to believe for instance, thatTraining and Development Manager before I left)!
as they get old, they can expect to graduallyAny Other Reasons For Retiring 60 Year Olds?
become "slow/poor thinkers...dull-witted" etc. In mostSo, does your company have any other reason(s)
cases, these expectations are based upon faultyfor asking people to retire at 60 years(or older),
inferences drawn from physical body changesother than the already mentioned fact that it's
observed to occur with age. In effect, I am saying"policy" or (the unstated assumption) that a 60 year
that contrary to popular belief, our mental capabilitiesold's usefulness to the company would have dropped
remain unaffected(at least not in any significantlytoo low? If YES, then maybe you don't need to try
negative way) by the body's ageing process!convincing your management to modify their
And NO, this is not an outrageous or unsubstantiatedapproach to implementing that "rule". If NO, then
assertion I'm making here. The entire matter was laidhopefully you/your company will want to tap FULLY
to rest as a result of verifiable research work carriedfrom the wisdom/knowledge of your veteran
out by respected scientists and professionals. Iemployees before letting them go completely.
provide details below.I am not saying that new/younger employees be
According to Tony Buzan (regarded as a worldprevented from coming in, just because you want to
authority on the brain, memory, creativity, and speedbenefit from some old person's wisdom. What I am
reading - and inventor of the world-famous Mindproposing is that companies try to strike a sensible
Maps®), Dr. Marion Diamond of the University ofbalance between both options. They can do this by
California confirmed via research findings that "therewatching out for specific individuals whose
is no evidence of brain cell loss with age in normal,antecedents/current performances, suggest that
active and healthy brains" (See reference item no. 1even though they have arrived at the "age of
listed at the bottom of this page).retirement", their continued presence in the
Instead, research indicates as Buzan puts it that "iforganisation/as team members - whether on contract
the brain is used and trained, there is a biologicalor part-time arrangement - could yield greater
increase in its interconnectivity complexity, i.e. thebottom line rewards for the company.
person's intelligence is raised". And he adds: "TrainingIncidentally, some companies already do this - so it is
of people in their sixties, seventies, eighties andNOT impossible!
nineties has shown that, in every area of mentalHow Can You Use This Report's Information?
performance, statistically significant and permanentHere are a few ways it can help YOU - if you let it:
improvements can be made".1. If you are already 60 years or older, you now
But how come we are just discovering this now? Orknow that you can still make the most of your life.
did some people from the old days know this truthThis is because clocking 60, does not imply you've
as well? Luckily for us, we have records ofrun out of time or abilities to achieve your dreams in
utterances made by someone like Thomas Alvalife.
Edison, a man whose achievements in life(despite2. As a 60 year old who has read this report, your
having what should have been the "handicap" ofkids and other young people around you, will
almost NO schooling) proved he had exceptional(hopefully!) find you very forthcoming as a coach
mental capability.mentor/teacher. This will derive from your awareness
Edison is reported to have said "The brain can bethat you can develop yourself further - especially
developed just the same as the muscles can bementally - to help them make better use of their
developed, if one will only take the pains to train theexperiences, and be more productive.
mind to think," and, "The brain that isn't used rusts.3. As a decision maker(who may not necessarily be
The brain that is used responds. The brain is exactlyyoung and therefore not up to 60 years of age),
like any other part of the body: it can beyou will treat veteran employees in your company,
strengthened by proper exercise, by proper use. Putwith more respect and possibly try to help them
your arm in a sling and keep it there for adevelop better brainpower, to become more useful
considerable length of time, and when you take itto the company before they have to retire.
out, you find that you can't use it. In the same way,4. You might be in a position to help influence the
the brain that isn't used suffers atrophy." (Seeinitiation of a re-think of the implementation of the
reference item no. 2 listed at the bottom of thisretirement rules in your company. This would be done
article).to ensure individuals who still have enough "USE
Considering that Edison was not even close to beingVALUE" to offer the company are "held on to", if
a medical doctor, talk less of being a brain surgeon,necessary as "independent" contractors to the
one can only try to imagine how he came about thiscompany.
strikingly accurate analysis of the brain's capabilities.Summary
Review the foregoing, against the background of theNow that you know the truth, please apply your
fact that Edison had barely more than three monthsknowledge - and share it with others as well. Bob
of schooling, then one cannot help but agree with theMarley once sang "Emancipate yourselves from
assertions he has made! But we could ask themental slavery; none but ourselves can free our
question "How did Edison know?" The obviousminds". I like to put it this way: Emancipate Your
answer in my opinion would be that Edison himselfThinking(TM)! Only by so doing, can we really achieve
was living proof of the fact he had stated. He hadour full potentials as human beings.
experienced what he had spoken about. That wasThe policies or "rules" in your company are unlikely to
the basis of his awareness and conviction on thebe cast in stone. Some person(s) would have
issue."formed" them at a time when it probably made
But, we can't stop there! The title of this report issense to have them THAT way. The reality from
"Your Company May Be Losing Money By Retiringwhat YOU know today however might make it
Employees When They Clock 60 Years (Andnecessary for you and/or other decision makers to
Above)!". To show how this can happen, we mustwork towards adapting your company's retirement
bring the aforementioned submissions to bear on thepolicy for instance in a way that allows the company
workplace situation in companies.benefit more optimally from the tremendous wealth
So How Did The "60 Years & Above"of knowledge, skills and talent that most of your
Retirement Age Issue Start?employees(especially the aging/long serving ones) are
The story of how this retirement age issue cameendowed with.
about is quite an intriguing one I must say.To make an organisation(or indeed a society) truly
Incidentally, the person through whom I gained thissuccessful, its members need to be made to believe
exciting insight into it, was past 65 years himselfin their own abilities to make a difference. One step
when he wrote the book in which he told the story.towards achieving that, is by helping them do away
I refer to Zig Ziglar. It was in his book "Over Thewith self-imposed limitations like the one about aging
Top"(reference item no. 3 listed at the bottom ofresulting in lower productivity. Let's get many of our
this page), that he narrated the anecdote under theold/aging people more actively involved, in improving
sub-heading of "Time and Timing". The true story -the way we do things for the better.
as told by Zig - about the origin of this "retirementReferences Consulted
age" problem, proves that age was not really the1. Buzan T., The Speed Reading Book, London, BBC
"issue". He began by noting that people haveWorldwide Limited, 2001.
generally considered 65 years as the retirement age -2. Hill N., Think and Grow Rich, New York, Hawthorn
giving examples of universities, religiousBooks, Inc, 1966.
denominations, blue-chip companies, and the military3. Ziglar Z.
etc as culprits. Then he told this story - I paraphrase