| Introduction | | | | 0.05 ha) |
| 1. Rice (Oryza sativa L) is most extensively cultivated | | | | Paddy 1 Nazir Ahmad DarS/O. Habib Ullah Dar |
| cereal crop in the world. It is a staple food of about | | | | Chatterhama Jehlum Breeders seed 0.2 4.50 |
| 2.4 billion or more. In South Asia as whole rice | | | | 2 Mohd.Maqbool Wani -do- -do- -do- -do- 4.75 |
| provides 23% per capita energy and 16% per capita | | | | 3 Gh.Nabi DarS/O.Ab.Rehman Dar -do- -do- -do- -do- |
| protein. Its protein content is modest 7% but it | | | | 4.75 |
| provides minerals, vitamins and fiber too. | | | | 4 Ab.Rashid DarS/O Ab.Gaffar Dar -do- -do- -do- -do- |
| Table 1. Rice Production Statistics in the world | | | | 3.87 |
| Country 1994 yield/hact/hac 1998 yield/hact/hac | | | | 5 Mohd Rafiq DarS/O Ab.Gaffar Dar -do- -do- -do- |
| Differencet/ hac Percentage Increase over years | | | | -do- 3.50 |
| China 5.9 6.1 0.2 3.28 | | | | 6 Parveez Ahmad MirS/O Gh.Mohd.Mir -do- Chenab |
| India 2.8 2.89 0.01 0.35 | | | | Foundation seed -do- 3.00 |
| Indonesia 4.3 4.1 -0.2 -4.88 | | | | 7 Mohd. Ashraf MirS/O Ab.Razak Mir -do- -do- -do- |
| Vietnam 3.5 3.9 0.4 10.26 | | | | -do- 3.60 |
| Japan 6.8 6.4 -0.4 -6.25 | | | | 8 Ab.Ahad BhatS/O Mohd Ismail Bhat Telbal Jehlum |
| Unites States 6.7 6.3 -0.4 -6.35 | | | | -do- -do- 3.00 |
| Korea 6.1 6.9 +0.8 11.59 | | | | 9 Mudasir Ahmad Bhat -do- -do- -do- -do- 3.60 |
| Pakistan 2.5 2.8 +0.3 10.71 | | | | 10 Gh.Nabi bhatS/O Ali Mohd Bhat -do- Chenab |
| Egypt 7.9 - - - | | | | Foundation seed -do- 4.00 |
| Iran 4.4 - - - | | | | 11 Gh.Nabi Wani -do- -do- -do- -do- 3.60 |
| Peru 5.8 - - - | | | | 12 Ab.Rehman BhatS/O Abdul Aziz Bhat Khudwani |
| Table 2. Rice Production in Indian States | | | | Juhlum Foundation seed -do- 4.00 |
| 1994 1998 Difference | | | | 13 Ab.Rehman BhatS/o Mohd.Sidiq Bhat -do- -do- -do- |
| West Bengal 1.9 2.2 +0.3 | | | | -do- 4.00 |
| Haryana 2.5 2.8 +0.3 | | | | 14 Bashir Ahmad BhatS/O Md.Shaban Bhat -do- -do- |
| Punjab 3.7 3.5 -0.2 | | | | -do- -do- 4.00 |
| Tamil Nadu 2.3 3.0 +0.7 | | | | 15 Mohd Shaban Mattoo S/O Gh.Rasool Mattoo -do- |
| Andhra Pradesh 2.6 2.9 +0.3 | | | | -do- -do- -do- 4.00 |
| Jammu & Kashmir | | | | 16 Gh.Mohd.DarS/O Gh.Rasool Bhat -do- -do- -do- -do- |
| Kashmir 2.5 2.8 +0.3 | | | | 4.0 |
| Jammu 1.6 1.9 +0.3 | | | | 17 Shabir Ahmad BhatS/O Gh.Rasool Bhat Shalimar |
| Jammu and Kashmir had the unique distinction of | | | | Chenab Breeders seed -do- 3.50 |
| having introduced land reforms. About 1.82 lakh | | | | 18 Ah.Ahad BhatS/O Riyaz Ahmad Bhat Shalimar |
| hectares of land were distributed. Out of it about | | | | Chenab Breeder seed 0.2 3.00 |
| 0.94 lakh hectare were distributed free of cost | | | | 19 Bashir Ahmad LoneS/O Gh.Nabi Lone -do- -do- -do- |
| among peasants. Although absentee landlordism was | | | | -do- 3.60 |
| abolished. Over years a neo-land holders have come | | | | 20 Md.Maqbool MirS/O Gh.Rasool Mir -do- -do- -do- |
| into existence which are comparable to absentee land | | | | -do- 3.0 |
| owners if not landlords holding large | | | | Cost of Production and Returns ha-1 |
| “Jagirs”. | | | | Cost/Unit Field |
| The reform was bound to achieve the twin purpose | | | | Experimental station with approved package of |
| of giving the cultivator his rightful place in the social | | | | practice Farmers practice |
| system and also ensure more efficient utilization of | | | | Total direct cost of production per hectare (up to |
| the state’s resources. | | | | packaging) Rs.20,500/- Rs.14,500/- |
| The main objective to achieve self-sufficiency in | | | | Total return/ha Rs.84,000/- Rs.59,000/- |
| terms of rice production, although leaped forward | | | | Net profit Rs.63,500/- Rs.44,500/- |
| from mere few lakh tones to 0.86 million tones. | | | | Average performance of Minikit Results of Paddy |
| However, the major break through has been | | | | over the |
| hampered due to various causes. A problem cause | | | | Valley (6 Districts during Kharif 2002 & Kharif |
| analysis done by us in the past could be summarized | | | | 2003. |
| in Fig. 1. | | | | A. Lower Belts |
| Problems | | | | S.N Name of the Cultivar Yield/hacKharif Kharif2002 |
| Rice production in the State of Jammu & | | | | 2003 Mean Rank %increase over check(Jehlum) |
| Kashmir is predominantly a mono-cropped activity. | | | | 1. SKAU-105 63.63 62.35 62.99 1 10.51% over Jehlum |
| The area is about 40% in Jammu Division & | | | | and 17% over Chinab (SKAU-23) |
| 60% in Kashmir Division. The irrigation availability is | | | | 2. SKAU-337 63.73 56.71 60.22 2 5% & 13.6% |
| around 91% as against 99% in Haryana & | | | | Respectively. |
| Punjab. The Haryana and Punjab irrigation is assured, | | | | 3. SKAU-27(Jehlum) 57.84 56.23 57.00 3 |
| which means free from climatic changes, as most of | | | | 4. SKAU-23 (Chinab) ------ 53.21 53.21 4 |
| it come from underground water sources. Our | | | | Average performance of Minikit Results of Paddy |
| irrigation potential in Kashmir for rice is snow bound. | | | | over the Valley (6 Districts during Kharif 2002 & |
| Most of it is through canal system, which dry up | | | | Kharof 2003). |
| during draughts and flood during heavy rains and | | | | B. Higher Belts |
| excessive snow. | | | | S.No. Name of the cultivar Yield /hac.Kharif 2002 |
| In spite of the climatic changes over years Rice | | | | Kharif 2003 Mean Rank % increase over 332 & |
| production has registered growth which may | | | | Khosar (check entries) |
| fluctuate with climatic conditions. Our food grain | | | | 1. K-312 43.33 42.07 42.70 3 Both the entries i.e K312 |
| production of 22.59 lakh tones by the end of 9th plan | | | | & K475 have yielded below over the check |
| registered a quantitum jump over 8th plan | | | | entries |
| productivity of 13.56 lakh tones. A similar up ward | | | | 2. K-475 45.59 41.62 43.06 2 |
| trend is discernible with regard to chemical fertilizers | | | | 3. K-332 42.04 42.71 42.35 4 |
| which have gone up from 43400 metric tones to | | | | 4. K-429 (Kohsar) 50.17 42.81 46.05 1 |
| 72400 metric tones during the same period. | | | | Average performance of SKAU-105 in District Yield |
| The common enhancement factors like; | | | | Trial conducted at Rice Research & Regional |
| 1. Improved seeds including hybrids both seed | | | | Station Khudwani Anantnag from 1989-2003. |
| production, certification and distribution among | | | | SN Vty. 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1998 |
| farmers needs critical evaluation. | | | | 2000 2001 2002 2003 |
| 2. The use of production recommendations by the | | | | 1. SKAU-105 68.52 67.06 70.18 60.20 62.50 70.60 67.75 |
| farmers needs effective transfer of technology | | | | 72.20 75.70 79.20 84.20 88.60 |
| mechanism with wide spread use of electronic and | | | | 2. SKAU-5Check 52.96 55.40 48,57 53.00 52.50 63.05 |
| print media along with on the job-training modules to | | | | 51.94 - - - - - |
| Agriculture Extension Workers. | | | | 3. Jehlum Check - - - - - - - 63.54 66.90 69.53 70.78 |
| 3. The whether dependent irrigation system has to | | | | 74.50 |
| be replaced with permanent or semi-assured irrigation | | | | Seed Supplied to the different KVK’s for |
| potential especially in Khandi belts. | | | | multiplication by the Division of Plant Breeding & |
| 4. Timely supply of inputs like fertilizers, weedicides, | | | | Genetics |
| fungicides, pesticides, along with fortification of | | | | S.No. Name of the KVK’s Crop Variety Class |
| humus (animal waste or organic manure use) & | | | | of seed Qty. supplied (Kgs) |
| or other essential nutrients like potash, zinc sulphate | | | | 1. KVK, Malangpora (Pulwama) Maize C15 FS 12 |
| etc. as per soil testing reports. | | | | Paddy Jehlum FS 30 |
| Needs and solutions | | | | 2. KVK, Pombay (Anantnag) Paddy K332 BS 160 |
| Low productivity causes: analysis scenario can be | | | | Kohsaar BS 92 |
| seen Fig. 1a) Non-availability of quality paddy seed | | | | Maize C15 FS 50 |
| Total land under rice | | | | Shalimar KGMaize-1 BS - |
| Kashmir Division 1.61 hectares | | | | Shalimar KG Maize-2 BS - |
| Distribution cropping area in hac | | | | French Bean Shalimar French Bean -1 BS - |
| High Altitude - 0.3 lac hectare | | | | Cowpea Shalimar Cowpea-1 BS 5 |
| Low altitude - 1.3 lac hectare | | | | Moong Shalimar Moong-1 BS 5 |
| Seed requirement | | | | 3. KVK, Srinagar Maize C15 FS 15 |
| Certified seed : Seed rate 60 Kg/haci.e. 60 x 1.60 hac | | | | 4. KVK, Kupwara Paddy Jehlum FS 80 |
| = 96 lac kgs | | | | Minikit results of check cultivars |
| For 10% replacement/year = 9.6 lac Kg. | | | | A. |
| 9,600 quintalssay 10,000 quintals | | | | Lower Belts Higher belts |
| Thus we need certified seed in the ratio of; | | | | Jehlum Kohsar / K 332 |
| High altitude rice varieties 2200 quintals | | | | S. No. Districts n Yield (t/ha) n Yield (t/ha) |
| Low altitude rice 7800 quintals | | | | 1. Srinagar 6 5.9 2 6.8 |
| Total 10000 quintals | | | | 2. Budgam 4 6.2 3 4.2 |
| For above certified seed we need Foundation Seed | | | | 3. Anantnag 6 4.6 2 (K 332) 3.9 |
| approx. | | | | 4. Pulwama 6 6.8 2 4.0 |
| High altitude belt 50 quintals land | | | | 5. Baramulla 6 5.8 2 4.0 |
| Low altitude belt 150 quintals 100 kanals - SKUAST, | | | | 6. Kupwara 5 5.3 1 6.2 |
| may produce it | | | | B. Experimental yield _____ 6 – 6.5 --------- 4.2 |
| Breeder seed needs | | | | – 4.7 |
| High altitude varieties 1.5q land | | | | Critical gaps (B-A) ------- 0.7 -1.2 Nil |
| Low altitude varieties 4.5q 10 kansls – SKUAT | | | | C. State average irrespective of cultivars 2.1 Critical |
| may produce it | | | | gaps 3- 4 t /ha-1 |
| Certified seed need 10,000 quintals | | | | D. Production farm average May be 2.5 -do- |
| Land 2000- 3000 kanals | | | | E. Yield average in farmer’s plot through |
| Say 5000 kanals | | | | various trial by SKUAST-K under IVLP programme 3.3 |
| 10 seed villages of 500 kanals in 6 Districts – | | | | (farmersPractice) 5.4(With technological intervation) |
| can be used to produce it under joint supervision of | | | | Document No. III Future Policies |
| SKUAST-K & Department Officersor | | | | A. Technology Transfer in agro-ecosystems |
| Allow post-graduate unemployed graduate 12 to | | | | perspective |
| supervision village seed production under SKUAST | | | | 1. To meet the growing needs of food grains for |
| scientist and seed certification staff of department. | | | | increasing population emphasis should be given on |
| (G.M.Wani) | | | | small production systems to achieve sustainability and |
| Director Extension Education | | | | optimum resource use. Benefits of agro-ecosystem |
| Document II : Targets and achievements | | | | analysis in the form of resource inventory, |
| Targets & Objectives:a) The food availability per | | | | identification of crops, cropping patterns and potential |
| person per day as per the ICMR recommendations is | | | | production zones, problem and causes analysis for |
| 420 grams. The food produced in J&K in 301 | | | | low productivity etc., need to be considered. |
| gms/day/person. Therefore, we have roughly 1/3rd | | | | 2. Small production systems are characterized by |
| food grain shortage in the State. However, the | | | | production basically meant for self consumption. |
| shortages may be higher in view of the report of Dr. | | | | Training activity need to be modified to achieve |
| M.S.Swaminathan (2003) which says that the | | | | increased productivity in mixed farming systems. |
| consumption of food grains in J&K is higher than | | | | Product diversification through introduction of various |
| those recommended by ICMR norms. In rural Kashmir | | | | alternate crops and income diversification of small |
| rice consumption is 489 gm (per person per day and | | | | farmers especially rural youth and school dropouts by |
| in urban it is 428 gm per person per day). Thus per | | | | offering training on farm income generation activities |
| capita rice consumption is higher than recommended | | | | like introduction of back yard poultry, wormiculture, |
| ICMR norms.b) Projecting the population of 40 million | | | | honey, mushroom production, goatry, dairy etc. |
| with rice as staple food, in an area of 1.60 lac | | | | 3. In case of green revolution production system |
| hectares for rice we need a yield potential of 5 | | | | (Progressive farmers) technology transfer would be |
| tonnes/ha | | | | geared up to achieve maximum productivity of |
| Explanation: | | | | individual crop. Training activity need to be further |
| Assuming 500 gm rice per person per day, we would | | | | strengthened by incorporation of various promising |
| need 2 quintals paddy per person per annum. i.e for | | | | technologies. For example in case of rice, introduction |
| 40 lac people, we need 80 lac quintel or 8 lac tones. | | | | of hybrid rice production technology for breaking yield |
| An area of 1.60 lac hectares under rice would need | | | | barriers. Training activity on hybrid rice production |
| roughly 5t/hac production to meet our requirements. | | | | techniques can become the part of school curriculum. |
| With the present productivity of 2.5t/h in Kashmir | | | | Similarly demonstrations should also be simultaneously |
| division, the target is difficult but could be achieved. | | | | taken up to prove the yield potentiality of new crops |
| Yet with increase in population over years, we may | | | | and new technologies/components. Multi-component |
| find “Self sufficiency a dream only” | | | | demonstrations need to be further strengthened. |
| To attain productivity of Rice at the rate of 5t/hac | | | | Extension activities like field days, film shows would |
| both in higher and lower belts. This would need | | | | also add further strength in this direction. |
| replacement of present seed varieties in the | | | | 1. Emphasis on commercial production systems would |
| farmer’s fields with higher yielding varieties | | | | include identification of crops and products which |
| evolved by SKUAST. A modest approach to replace | | | | have demand in international market like medicinal |
| the 10% paddy seed each year can be executed | | | | aromatic rice of export value etc. Training |
| under present infrastructure and land availability. The | | | | programmes and demonstrations would include |
| question of future sustainability of rice production to | | | | technologies for production of various crops having |
| feed increasing population may need further increase | | | | export value with due regard to quality and less |
| in seed replacement schedules by 20 -30% each year | | | | pesticide residue effects. More focus should be given |
| which may need a proper planning and organization. | | | | to eco-friendly technologies like integrated pest |
| Aim for future : Self sufficiency in Rice production | | | | management trough IPM techniques, integrated |
| Target : 5t/hac production of Rice | | | | nutrient management through use of vermicompost |
| Facts | | | | and organic farming. Linkages of progressive farmer |
| 1. Under farmers field we have attained a yield of 3-5 | | | | groups with renowned export firms would be |
| t/hac using improved seed. The details of the | | | | established to make export process more |
| investigation at formers field and by the farmer may | | | | transparent. |
| be seen - Table 2.1 | | | | 2. Farmers would be equipped with safe and suitable |
| The improved package of practices prepared by | | | | technologies for increased production of such items |
| SKUAST and when used by farmers resulted into | | | | which have global market. This is essential |
| total returns of Rs. 84,000/hac as against Rs. 54,000 | | | | requirement under globalization under GATT especially |
| hac by usual farmers practices. Thus under present | | | | to safeguard human health with minimal pesticide or |
| conditions a net profit of Rs. 63,500/hac was | | | | other residues. |
| attainable from Rice production which indicates rice | | | | 3. Experience from KVK, Medak in Andhra Pradesh |
| production a profitable enterprise – Table 2.2 | | | | suggests that rural women play an important role in |
| 2. During Kharif 2002 & 2003, the three SKUAST | | | | preservation of biodiversity of various plans having |
| varieties yield 6t/hac under farmers fields. These | | | | value in terms of food, high productivity, resistance |
| minikit trails were conducted jointly by SKUAST | | | | to various biotic and abiotic stresses apart from |
| & Agricultural Department experts in all the 6 | | | | usefulness in treatment of various diseases of plants, |
| districts of the valley. They were monitored and | | | | animals and human beings. Efforts have already been |
| discussed in the Zonal Research Extension Advisory | | | | made in the form of creating awareness for |
| Committee meetings held in 2002 & 2003. The | | | | identification of varieties, species and plants. Women |
| details variety wise yields/hac are shown in Table 2.3 | | | | work force training is still a weak link in our Rice |
| for lower belt rice fields Table 2.4 for higher altitude | | | | Production system. |
| rice fields. | | | | KVK’s may prepare farmers to preserve |
| An review of the two tables indicate that under | | | | biodiversity. This needs proper linkages with lead |
| upper rice land belts (high altitudes) the SKUAST | | | | institutes. The main objective would be to establish |
| varieties have proved a potential of 4.5 q/hac and | | | | an altogether innovative concept of “Rural |
| under low rice zone, lower belts, a higher potential of | | | | genebanks” by proper harnessing of |
| 6t/hac was attained. The two combined suffice to | | | | indigenous wisdom and scientific talent. |
| our present needed yield under yield conditions on an | | | | 4. Education & Training |
| average 5t/hac. Thus, the target is attainable & | | | | Rural women constitute major workforce in Indian |
| achievable. | | | | agriculture. Studiesconducted and data generated in |
| 3. Under scientific farm conditions at SKUAST Rice | | | | this regard suggests that in spite of their significant |
| Research Station, Khudwani, a yield potential of 8.8 t | | | | role in food production, value addition, conservation |
| hac was achieved Table 2.5, otherwise too under | | | | of bio-diversity and environment etc, they remained |
| field conditions with use of production | | | | as invisible farmers. The invisibility of women as a |
| recommendation a yield potential of 6.8 t/hac was | | | | farmer is due to the fact that women are engaged |
| reported Table 2.6 | | | | mostly in production activity but they don’t |
| Under Village Linked Extension Education | | | | have a role to play in remunerative activity. We must |
| programmes, the farmers practices yielded 3.3 t/hac | | | | focus on effective use of small tools and implements |
| and when one or two intervention like replace of | | | | to reduce women drudgery, training on income |
| wooden plough with Shalimar plough was made a | | | | generation activities to facilitate greater role in |
| yield potential of 5.4 t/hac was achieved. Thus, under | | | | decision making and economic independence of rural |
| present status of technology already demonstrated | | | | women. Efforts would also be made to utilize their |
| to farmers through Agriculture Department, a yield | | | | un-exploited potential in conservation of germplasm |
| potential required 5 – 6 t/hac has been | | | | through establishment of rural genebanks and linking |
| demonstrated. Now it is for effective extension | | | | them to national repository by proper training and |
| mechanism at Directorate of Agriculture level to | | | | guidance. |
| extend the technological awareness. For detailed | | | | 5. Information Technology |
| policy projections, document III may be seen. | | | | Revolution in information technology and |
| 4. Hybrid Seed Propagation | | | | India’s contribution in this regard has created |
| The hybrid rice production technology in China has | | | | edge over the globe. It is proposed to utilize this |
| yielded 9.9 t/hac of rice. This coupled with growth | | | | powerful tool to bring revolutions in transfer of |
| duration of 123 days and milling recovery rate of | | | | technology process in J&K. A beginning has to |
| 68.7% do promise to boost our productivity once | | | | be made. The main agenda here would be to evolve |
| more as in 1970 through use of Chinese hybrid seed | | | | an innovative concept, “e-Farmer, E-KVK and |
| technology but this hybrid technology is webbed with | | | | E-extension” for rapid and effective |
| certain problems too.a. Use new seeds every year: It | | | | communication and transfer of technology. |
| is a seed dependant technological intervention, which | | | | 6. Investments made in the past in the field of |
| under our present set up may prove more failure | | | | agricultural research, education and extension system |
| than success on its wide use. However, for pilot field | | | | has now created large “standing |
| studies and under research management farms we | | | | capacity” for India, in terms of availability of |
| may continue its use as future long term strategy.b. | | | | scientific man power and infrastructure. |
| Seed rate is 20Kg per hectare as against 60 Kg per | | | | Globalization of agriculture and advancement in the |
| hectare, but seeds harvested from previous hybrid | | | | field of information technology has set new agenda |
| crops can not be used. Until our farmers are fully | | | | for generation, assessment and dissemination of |
| trained and acquainted with the technology. Its use | | | | technologies in agricultural and allied fields. Hence, |
| needs to be limited to Govt, University or | | | | there is an urgent need to reorient the present |
| progressive farmers farms only.c. The advantage of | | | | extension system in general and the technology |
| hybrid seed with less seed rate is hidden in its hybrid | | | | transfer process in Particular |
| vigor potential. These seeds have rapid root growth | | | | 7. The following broader areas need to be set into |
| and greater leaf area development potential. Thus | | | | motion for technology transfer |
| more number of spikelets per unit area, increase | | | | · Rural income generation |
| productivity. | | | | · Environment preservation |
| Detailed requirements for hybrid rice cultivation at | | | | · Conservation of biodiversity |
| present are beyond the capacity of our farmers. A | | | | · Sustainability of natural resources |
| detailed description on hybrid seeds in China can be | | | | · Diversification |
| seen in any web page & is reproduced herein | | | | · Improvement in status of women and |
| for reference (Annexure-1) | | | | other disadvantaged groups |
| Performance of participatory Seed Production | | | | · Exploitation of commercially viable |
| Programme conducted in two Districts of Kashmir | | | | technologies and enhancement of export potential |
| Valley during Khairf, 2004 (Crop Rice) | | | | 8. Reformation model Annexure I, SKUAST |
| Crop Name of farmers Village Variety Class of seed | | | | component of Broad Base Agric.Extension Model |
| Area sown {ha) Qty. of seed product,q/kanal or q | | | | Annexure II & other documents are enclosed. |